Versus Book #71. Got a new possible mystery here. You know there's nothing wrong with believing that something could be possible when it just seems like there's a piece to the puzzle missing. In this book "Where Did The Towers Go?" by Judy Wood she speaks about her theory on free energy technology being used on the twin towers. She's compiled a huge amount of investigative evidence and forensic analysis in a large textbook. I love the angle she's taking, instead of mentioning the obvious "whodunit" idea. Instead, she delves into the part that nobody could fathom. This one is for those that want a great amount of information to consider as proof. She goes for the jugular to see just what happened. The rest, would be the "why", which we may never even know. Judy's premise is that the towers could in no way disintegrate and fall into pure ash with nothing left unless some sort of tech destabilized the integrity of it. I could understand that and many are probably starting to wonder. The planes crashed into the buildings without exploding and caused a fire, which in turn heated the core of the buildings, but why did they collapse? Collapsing completely is not normal. Read her scientific research to get a better understanding of what she thinks caused it. It makes no sense for it to just fall as ash, killing many firefighters. Ground Zero was covered in a fine ash. She's a very smart woman with plenty of education to back up her words. From the evidence this seems valid. She uses phenomena from nature and anomalies to prove her point. The picture says it all doesn't it? This is very intriguing. My theory is maybe a military grade weapon satellite did it. I doubt it
was funded privately, like in "Revenge". These are sensitive matters with higher technology, like in "Fringe". What's even scarier are the implications. What if someone framed the terrorists in the Middle East in order to destabilize our economy? What if the military was making events happen, just like some Nostradamus cult, independent of the government? Anyhow, this book does not cover possible reasons; these are my ideas and theories independent of hers. She does not wish to be connected to any conspiracy theories and I respect that. Her book is evidence of her claims. You may agree. This should be engaging and insightful. This review is objective and does not assume what her book is about. I look forward to reading the whole book and she makes no assumptions about why anything happened. This book is not after the notion of a "who" or "why"; instead it serves as a scientific textbook to enlighten you and expand your mind to new ideas. It contains many pictures and if that's not enough there are interviews on Youtube. Worth a read for curious minds.
Digg this article here
Guest Commentator HARVESTER OF SORROW says: "I could tell you what happened but it would ruin all I have planned!"
2 Responses to "The Mystery Of The Towers"
February 25, 2012 2:39 PM #
It appears the person who posted this article has not read the book and is only speculating what it might be about. Anyone who has read Dr. Wood’s book knows that it contains only evidence, not “theories” and not a “another conspiracy theory.” When I see someone promoting her book as “another theory,” I begin to question their motive. This book contains no speculation or theories. It does not address anything to do with speculating who planned (conspired) what with whom, so therefore it cannot be about a conspiracy, either. It contains a comprehensive forensic investigation of what happened.
February 27, 2012 11:15 AM #
The conspiracy was my idea, as stated. She was talking about the weapon angle.
Post a Comment